Skip to main content

The Campaign To Purchase Rural England

If you really cared about something that was under threat how would you go about protecting it? A practical option could be ownership or at least part-ownership, like the campaigners trying to save Ancoats Dispensary in Manchester, or the Pompey Supporters Trust, which took control of Portsmouth Community Football Club. A political option could be a campaign, like the Labour's twenty year fight to save the NHS...

This came to mind at a RTPI-sponsored Green Belt debate at Oxford Brookes University, where the Campaign to Protect Rural England's (CPRE) Head of Planning, Matt Thomson, began his remarks by stating that the CPRE "like to think that we own the Green Belt."

The CPRE do not, obviously, own the Green Belt, and instead 'stand up for it' on it's member's behalf, but what if it did? What if, in order to provide a 'beautiful and thriving countryside for everyone' the CPRE started to acquire beautiful land for the benefit of not just it's member's but for everyone. According to Wikipedia, the CPRE has 60,000 'members and supporters'. If all of those people paid the suggested subscription of £3 a month then the CPRE would have an annual income from subscriptions of over a £2 million. Investing half of that in farmland, at, say, £15,000 an acre, could represent 66 acres per year. Not a great deal, but over time it could be, and if the public are so keen to maintain the unique character of the English landscape, and to support sustainable farming and locally produced food (and 4.2 million National Trust members suggest that we are), perhaps people would actually spend more than £3 a month to do so. There might even be membership dividends from all of the farmshops, ice cream parlours and car parks...

A CPRE with a budget to identify, protect and improve access to special landscapes would, perhaps, make a greater contribution to the rural environment than a CPRE with a single 'Save Our Countryside' mandate. In this blog Shaun Spiers, Chief Executive of the CPRE, recognises that "we need more houses, and some of them will inevitably go on greenfield sites. But we need to build with care." There is nothing more careful than a local plan process so let us imagine that through that process the sites most representative of the unique character of the English landscape were identified and allocated as such. With no development value at all they could be acquired at little more than market value. In the meantime, sites that are not representative of the unique character of the English landscape can be allocated for development.
 
So I would like to propose to the CPRE that it does buy some Green Belt. In fact, I think that I would join the Campaign To Purchase Rural England. More local plans would get adopted, more homes would get built, and there would be more chance of a 'beautiful and thriving countryside for everyone'.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Planning Reform Week

The first bit On the day that I started writing this the Prime Minister has confirmed in a move considered intellectually incoherent by some that hundreds of new oil and gas licenses will be granted in the UK, which signals that it is ‘Energy Week’ on the Government’s summer recess comms grid. A line appears to have been drawn from the role of an Ultra Low Emission Zone policy in securing a marginal win for the Conservatives in the Uxbridge & South Ruislip by-election to the softening of commitments to a net zero energy strategy. Seven days ago the Prime Minister launched the grid’s ‘Planning Reform Week’ by announcing that the Government will meet its manifesto commitment to build 1 million homes over this parliament, which would represent “another important milestone in the government’s already successful housebuilding strategy”. It is notable given the ground that Labour has gained on housing in recent months that the first week of the parliamentary recess was devoted to tryin
1 comment
Read more

Life on the Front Line

I like it when people get in touch with me to suggest topics for 50 Shades of Planning Podcast episodes because, firstly, it means that people are listening to it and also, and most importantly, it means I do not have to come up with ideas myself. I found this message from a team leader at a local authority striking and sobering though. In a subsequent conversation the person that sent this confided in me that their team is virtually in crisis mode. It is probably fair to say that the planning system is in crisis, but then it is also probably fair to say that the planning system is always in crisis… There is, of course, the issue of resources. Whilst according to a Planning magazine survey slightly more LPAs are predicting growth in planning department budgets (25%) rather than a contraction (22%), this has to be seen in the context of a 38% real-terms fall in net current expenditure on planning functions between 2010–11 and 2017–18. Beyond resources though the current crisis feels m
42 comments
Read more

Life on the Front Line II

It was about a year ago that Catriona Riddell first wrote in Planning magazine about low morale in local planning authorities, which Catriona, Peter Geraghty, Paul Brocklehurst and I followed up with the 'Life on the Front Line' 50 Shades podcast episode ( no. 60 ). 'Life on the Front Line' was informed by a 'Call for Evidence', the submissions to which, mostly anonymised, are reproduced on the Life on the Front Line 50 Shades blog post. Catriona has again used her Planning magazine column to raise the issue of morale in LPAs, making the point that, one year on, it does not feel like things have improved much. Many of the factors impacting on morale have been well documented, Catriona writes, but whilst there seems to be some general agreement around the causes, little has been offered in the way of solutions. As Catriona writes, too many authorities are actively discouraging a return to the office, which is not healthy; not conducive to team working; and is un
1 comment
Read more