Skip to main content

Local people and the delivery of new homes

Writing for the Conservative Home website yesterday (15 December), Housing and Planning Minister Brandon Lewis stated that..

"... it was clear that to really solve these problems we needed a new level of thinking, which challenged the prevailing orthodoxy of top-down bureaucratic control. That new principle was localism: ensuring that local authorities, and local people, have more control over the delivery of new homes in their area."

Deliciously, only a day later, a recovered appeal decision from Secretary of State Eric Pickles in Rolleston on Dove illustrates both what can happen when communities have more control over the delivery of new homes, and what can happen when politicians like Mr Lewis and Mr Pickles, who are tasked with 'significantly boosting the supply of housing', have to intervene in marginal constituencies in the run up to a general election.
 
The context:

The site in Rolleston on Dove is a housing allocation in the draft local plan and there is no five year supply of deliverable housing land.

A neighbourhood plan was drafted that made provision for two allocations of only 11 houses each (in a top tier settlement of 3,000 people), and sought a local green space allocation on the site in question.
 
The neighbourhood plan examiner removed the local green space designation on the site and made clear the neighbourhood plan allocations should not be seen as a ceiling, but the neighbourhood plan has not proceeded to referendum.

A planning application for 100 homes was submitted, refused, and an appeal inspector recommended approval.

...and Mr Pickles' decision:

“In view of the Framework policy (paragraphs 183-185) that neighbourhood plans will be able to shape and direct sustainable development, and having had full regard to paragraph 216 of the Framework, the Secretary of State places very substantial negative weight on the potential prejudicial effect on the outcome of the plan-making process…Though the strategic allocation of the site in the emerging Local plan is not included in the NP, the Independent Examiner found that with his suggested modifications the NP would meet the statutory requirements.”

What is particularly striking here is that unlike appeals in Broughton Astley and Hurstpierpoint that have been refused this is a neighbourhood plan that makes virtually no provision for new housing. If that is what the good burghers of Rolleston on Dove want then good luck to them. In the absence of either a local plan that directs a more proportionate amount of development to a top tier settlement, or a requirement for the neighbourhood plan to show that it is meeting the settlements future housing needs, then there is not much that the development community, the Borough Council or the Planning Inspectorate can do to stop them.

Two points of note though. Firstly, it reinforces the argument that local control means no development rather than more development. Secondly, it highlights that whilst Rolleston on Dove might have chosen not to accommodate any of East Staffordshire's future housing requirement, that housing growth has not and will not go away. It will have to be accommodated somewhere, but will East Staffordshire get it's local plan in place before the next drawbridge goes up?

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Planning Reform Week

The first bit On the day that I started writing this the Prime Minister has confirmed in a move considered intellectually incoherent by some that hundreds of new oil and gas licenses will be granted in the UK, which signals that it is ‘Energy Week’ on the Government’s summer recess comms grid. A line appears to have been drawn from the role of an Ultra Low Emission Zone policy in securing a marginal win for the Conservatives in the Uxbridge & South Ruislip by-election to the softening of commitments to a net zero energy strategy. Seven days ago the Prime Minister launched the grid’s ‘Planning Reform Week’ by announcing that the Government will meet its manifesto commitment to build 1 million homes over this parliament, which would represent “another important milestone in the government’s already successful housebuilding strategy”. It is notable given the ground that Labour has gained on housing in recent months that the first week of the parliamentary recess was devoted to tryin

Life on the Front Line

I like it when people get in touch with me to suggest topics for 50 Shades of Planning Podcast episodes because, firstly, it means that people are listening to it and also, and most importantly, it means I do not have to come up with ideas myself. I found this message from a team leader at a local authority striking and sobering though. In a subsequent conversation the person that sent this confided in me that their team is virtually in crisis mode. It is probably fair to say that the planning system is in crisis, but then it is also probably fair to say that the planning system is always in crisis… There is, of course, the issue of resources. Whilst according to a Planning magazine survey slightly more LPAs are predicting growth in planning department budgets (25%) rather than a contraction (22%), this has to be seen in the context of a 38% real-terms fall in net current expenditure on planning functions between 2010–11 and 2017–18. Beyond resources though the current crisis feels m

Life on the Front Line II

It was about a year ago that Catriona Riddell first wrote in Planning magazine about low morale in local planning authorities, which Catriona, Peter Geraghty, Paul Brocklehurst and I followed up with the 'Life on the Front Line' 50 Shades podcast episode ( no. 60 ). 'Life on the Front Line' was informed by a 'Call for Evidence', the submissions to which, mostly anonymised, are reproduced on the Life on the Front Line 50 Shades blog post. Catriona has again used her Planning magazine column to raise the issue of morale in LPAs, making the point that, one year on, it does not feel like things have improved much. Many of the factors impacting on morale have been well documented, Catriona writes, but whilst there seems to be some general agreement around the causes, little has been offered in the way of solutions. As Catriona writes, too many authorities are actively discouraging a return to the office, which is not healthy; not conducive to team working; and is un